Elogio dell’incertezza. Decisori e osservatori nella società moderna
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57611/qts.v2i2.291Parole chiave:
uncertainity, decision making, communication, second order observationAbstract
That uncertainty is a fundamental resource for decision-making processes has been known for some time, especially in organizational studies, which mostly refer to probabilistic evaluation, heuristics, cognitive biases, risk assessment and more. The article starts from the assumption that uncertainty is always uncertainty of an observer and hypothesizes that the subsystems of modern society must produce it in specific forms in order to operate (decide) and to be able to construct the reality to which they refer. In particular, three particularly evident cases of self-produced uncertainty are analyzed: science, law and politics. These subsystems create an uncertain future in the form of oscillation (respectively experiment, sentence, elections), and then entrust the result to their specific networks of observations (publications, jurisprudence, public opinion). Among other things, this requires the redefinition of the identifying concepts of these subsystems (objective reality, justice, legitimation) in a procedural (therefore decisional) and no longer substantial form. Only in this way is it possible, today, to build the reality on which society communicates.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Alvares, C., Dahlgren, P., 2016, Populism, extremism and media: Mapping an uncertain terrain, European Journal of Communication, n. 1, a. XXXI, pp. 46-57.
Anderson, C., 2008, The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete, Wired, 23 giugno.
Bakken, T., Wiik, E. L., 2018, Ignorance and Organization Studies, Organization Studies, n. 8, a. XXXIX, pp. 1109-1120.
Bateson, G., 1976, Verso un’ecologia della mente, Milano, Adelphi (ed. or. 1972).
- 1984, Mente e natura: un’unità necessaria, Milano, Adelphi (ed. or. 1979).
Beck, U., 2013 La società del rischio: verso una seconda modernità, Carocci Roma (ed or. 1986).
Best, J., 2008, Ambiguity, Uncertainty, and Risk: Rethinking Indeterminacy, International Political Sociology, a. II, pp. 355–374.
van der Bles, A. M., van der Linden, S., Freeman, A. L. J., Mitchell, J., Galvao, A. B., Zaval, L., Spiegelhalter, D. J., 2019, Communicating uncertainty about facts, numbers and science, R. Soc. open sci., n. 6: 181870. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181870
Brunsson, N., 1985, The Irrational Organization. Irrationality as a Basis for Organizational Action and Change, J. Wiley & Sons, Chichester-New York-Brisbane-Toronto-Singapore.
- 2002, The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations, Copenhagen Business School Press.
Cevolini, A., 2020, Gambling on Claim Frequency: Loss Expectation and the Spread of Risks in the Making of Modern Insurance, Soziale Systeme, n. 2, a. XXV, pp. 329-353.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2020-0024
Cevolini, A., & Esposito, E., 2020, From pool to profile: Social consequences of algorithmic prediction in insurance, Big Data & Society, n. 2, a. VII. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720939228
Domingos, P., 2016, L’algoritmo definitivo: la macchina che impara da sola e il futuro del nostro mondo, Torino, Bollati Boringhieri (ed. or. 2015).
Elkana, Y., 1988, Experiment as a Second-Order Concept, Science in Context, n. 1, a. II, pp. 177-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889700000545
- 1989, L’emergere del pensiero di secondo livello nella Grecia classica, in Idem, Antropologia della conoscenza, Laterza, Roma-Bari, pp. 111-151 (ed. or. 1981).
von Foerster, H., 1988, Sistemi che osservano, Astrolabio, Roma (ed. or. 1984).
- 1992, Ethics and Second-order Cybernetics, Cybernetics and Human Knowing, n. 1, a. I, pp. 9-19.
- 2003, Understanding Understanding: Essays on Cybernetics and Cognition, Springer, New York.
Goffman, E., 2001, Frame analysis: l’organizzazione dell’esperienza, Armando, Roma (ed. or. 1974).
- 2010, Asylums. Le istituzioni totali: i meccanismi dell’esclusione e della violenza, Einaudi, Torino (ed. or. 1961).
Habermas, J., 1990, Storia e critica dell’opinione pubblica, Laterza, Roma-Bari (ed. or. 1962).
Heider, F., 1990, Psicologia delle relazioni interpersonali, Il mulino, Bologna (ed. or. 1958).
Jalonen, H., 2012, The Uncertainty of Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature, Journal of Management Research, n. 1, a. IV, E1.
Kaufmann, F.-X., 1970, Sicherheit als soziologisches und sozialpolitisches Problem. Eine Untersuchung zu einer Wertidee hochdifferenzierter Gesellschaften, Enke, Stoccarda.
Knight F. H., 1960, Rischio, incertezza e profitto, La nuova Italia, Firenze (ed. or. 1921).
Luhmann, N., 1989, Theorie der politischen Opposition, Zeitschrift für Politik, a. XXXVI, p. 13-26.
- 1992, Die Beobachtung der Beobachter im politischen System: Zur Theorie der öffentlichen Meinung, in: J. Wilke (a cura di), Öffentliche Meinung. Theorie, Methoden, Befunde. Beiträge zu Ehren von Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann, Alber, Friburgo-Monaco, pp. 77-86.
- 1995, Procedimenti giuridici e legittimazione sociale, A. Giuffré, Milano (ed. or. 1969).
- 1996, Sociologia del rischio, Bruno Mondadori, Milano (ed. or. 1991).
- 1997, Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft, Suhrkamp, Francoforte.
- 2000a, Die Politik der Gesellschaft, Suhrkamp, Francoforte.
- 2000b, La realtà dei mass media, Angeli, Milano (ed. or. 1996).
- 2002, Das Erziehungssystem der Gesellschaft, Suhrkamp, Francoforte.
- 2005, Organizzazione e decisione, Paravia Bruno Mondadori, Milano (ed. or. 2000).
- 2006, Osservazioni sul moderno, Armando, Roma, 2006 (ed. or. 1992).
- 2017, L’arte della società, Mimesis, Milano (ed. or. 1995).
- 2020, L’economia della società, Angeli, Milano (ed. or. 1988).
McGoey, L., 2012, Strategic unknowns: towards a sociology of ignorance, Economy and Society, n. 1, a. XLI, pp. 1-16.
Mackay, D. M., 1969, Information, Mechanism and Meaning, MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass).
March J. G., 1998, Prendere decisioni, Il mulino, Bologna (ed. or. 1994).
March, J. G., Simon, H. A., 2003, Teoria dell’organizzazione, nuova edizione Etas, Milano (ed. or. 1958).
Oksenberg Rorty, E., 1980, Self-Deception, Akrasia and Irrationality, Social Science Information, n. 6, a. XIX, pp. 905-922.
Ozouf, M., 1997, Le concept d’opinion publique au XVIIIe siècle, Sociologie de la communication, n. 1, a. I, pp. 349-365.
Popper, K.R., 1970, Logica della scoperta scientifica, Einaudi, Torino (ed. or. 1935).
- 1972, Congetture e confutazioni, il Mulino, Bologna, voll.2 (ed. or. 1962).
Quinn, R.E., 1989, Beyond Rational Management: Mastering the Paradoxes and Competing Demands of High Performance, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Cal.
Scott, B., 2004, Second-order cybernetics: an historical introduction, Kybernetes, n. 9/10, a. XXXIII, pp. 1365-1378.
Shackle, G.L.S., 1969, Decision, Order and Time in Human Affairs, Cambridge UP, Cambridge.
Simon, H. A., 1976, From substantive to procedural rationality, in T.J. Kastelein, S.K. Kuipers, W.A. Nijenhuis, G.R. Wagenaar (a cura di), Method And Appraisal in Economics - 25 Years of Economic Theory, Springer, Boston (MA), pp. 65-86.
- 2000, Scienza economica e comportamento umano, Edizioni di Comunità, Torino (ed. or. 1997).
Vanden Broeck, P., 2020, Beyond school: transnational differentiation and the shifting form of education in world society, Journal of Education Policy, n. 6, a. XXXVI, pp. 836-855. DOI: 10.1080/02680939.2019.1652769
de Vries, M.F.R., 2001, L’organizzazione irrazionale. La dimensione nascosta dei comportamenti organizzativi, Raffaello Cortina, Milano (ed. or. 1999).
Watzlavick, P., Jackson, D.D., Beavin, H.J., 1971, Pragmatica della comunicazione umana, Astrolabio, Roma (ed. or. 1962).
White, H. C., 1981, Where Do Markets Come From?, The American Journal of Sociology, n. 3, a. LXXXVII, pp. 517-547.
Weick. K.E., 1997, Senso e significato nell’organizzazione: alla ricerca delle ambiguità e delle contraddizioni nei processi organizzativi, R. Cortina, Milano (ed. or. 1995).
Zagrebelsky, G., Portinaro, P. P., Luther, J. (a cura di), 1996, Il futuro della costituzione, Einaudi, Torino.
Zaret, D., 1996, Printing and the Invention of Public Opinion in the English Revolution, American Journal of Sociology, 101, pp. 1497-1555.
- 2000, Origins of Democratic Culture: printing, petitions, and the public sphere in early-modern England, Princeton, NJ, Princeton UP.
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2023 Giancarlo Corsi
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale 4.0 Internazionale.
<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/"><img alt="Licenza Creative Commons" style="border-width:0" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />Quest'opera è distribuita con Licenza <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale 4.0 Internazionale</a>.